Vol. 10 No. 1 (2018): Archives of Public Health
Public Health

Verification of the qualitative methods with test devices for detection of drugs of abuse in urine

Јасна (Jasna) Богданска (Bogdanska)
Институт за медицинска и експериментална биохемија, Медицински факултет, Универзитет "žÐ¡Ð². Кирил и Методиј", Скопје
Катерина (Katerina) Тошеска-Трајковска (Tosheska-Trajkovska)
Институт за медицинска и експериментална биохемија, Медицински факултет, Универзитет "žÐ¡Ð². Кирил и Методиј", Скопје
Светлана (Svetlana) Цековска (Cekovska)
Институт за медицинска и експериментална биохемија, Медицински факултет, Универзитет "žÐ¡Ð². Кирил и Методиј", Скопје
Соња (Sonja) Топузовска (Topuzovska)
Институт за медицинска и експериментална биохемија, Медицински факултет, Универзитет "žÐ¡Ð². Кирил и Методиј", Скопје
Даница (Danica) Лабудовиќ (Labudovik)
Институт за медицинска и експериментална биохемија, Медицински факултет, Универзитет "žÐ¡Ð². Кирил и Методиј", Скопје

Published 2018-04-30

Keywords

  • verification,
  • qualitative method,
  • drugs of abuse,
  • urine

How to Cite

1.
Богданска (Bogdanska) Јасна (Jasna), Тошеска-Трајковска (Tosheska-Trajkovska) Катерина (Katerina), Цековска (Cekovska) Светлана (Svetlana), Топузовска (Topuzovska) Соња (Sonja), Лабудовиќ (Labudovik) Даница (Danica). Verification of the qualitative methods with test devices for detection of drugs of abuse in urine. Arch Pub Health [Internet]. 2018 Apr. 30 [cited 2024 Nov. 5];10(1):31-5. Available from: https://id-press.eu/aph/article/view/1881

Abstract

The verification of the  qualitative method with test  devices for detection of eight drugs of abuse in urine  (amphetamines, methamphetamine,  barbiturates,  benzoylecgonine,  marijuana, 3,4-methylendioxy-methamphetamine, methadone, and opiates) was done using the assessment results  from External Quality Assessment  Scheme according to  verification protocol in  our laboratory, which included predefined performance characteristics such as: accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the method, as well as for method comparison analysis. Our results have shown that  qualitative methods for detection of drugs of abuse in urine have fulfilled the predefined criteria in regard to sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for screening purposes. There was a good agreement between the observed results and assessment results. Reliability of the method has fulfilled the predefined criteria with the exception for amphetamine and methamphetamine (weak and none, respectively). As a conclusion we may say that the rapid non-instrumented test devices for detection of drugs of abuse in urine have shown satisfactory verification results and have fulfilled the criteria for intended purposes according to the ISO 15189 Standard.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Закон за здравÑтвена заштита на Република Македонија. Available at: http://zdravstvo.gov.mk/wp-content/ uploads/2015/05/Zakon-za-zdravstve- na-zashtita-konsolidiran-tekst-2015.10. pdf. updated on July 14th 2017.
  2. ISO/IEC 15189:20 (E). ISRM – Licence for Institute for Medical and Exper- imental Biochemistry-Medical Fac- ulty, Skopje, No. ML-009; valid till 25.05.2021.
  3. ISO. Medical Laboratories- Particular requirements for quality and compe- tence ISO 15189, Geneva: ISO, 2012.
  4. EA-3/04. Use оf proficiency testing as a tool for accreditation in testing. 2001:1-18.
  5. NATA. Guidelines for the validation and verification of quantitative and qualitative test methods. Technical Note 17, 2013.
  6. Nordin G. Before defining perfor- mance criteria we must agree on what a "quantitative test procedure" is. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015; 53(6): 939-941.
  7. Topic E, Nikolac N, Panteghini M, The- odorsson E, Salvano GL, Miler M et al. How to assess the quality of your an- alytical method? Clin Chem Lab Med 2015; 53(11): 1707-1718.
  8. McHugh M. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med 2012, 22(3): 276-282.
  9. Guidance for Testing of Illicit Drugs in Seized Materials and Biological Spec- imens. Available at: https://www.un- odc.org/documents/scientific/valida- tion. Updated on November 2016.
  10. Standardized Protocol for Method Validation/Verification. https://www. aphl.org/mrc/documents/lss_2014_ texas-clia-standardized-method-vali- dation.pdf. Updated November 2016.
  11. Viera AJ, Gariett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistics. Fam Med 2005; (37): 5:360-3.